cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com

CoTyroneIreland.com Mailing List

View all threads

Incentive/Land Ownership Question

KQ
Katherine Q
Mon, Jan 18, 2021 11:52 PM

Hello Listers,
I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century:

  1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service?
  2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land?
    And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land?

Thanks for any help you can provide,

Katherine Quigley

Hello Listers, I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century: 1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service? 2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land? And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land? Thanks for any help you can provide, Katherine Quigley
RM
Ron McCoy
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 1:11 AM

Hi Katherine

In Canada after the war of 1812 it was a common practice to offer land
to pay out soldiers who fought in the war. Soldiers would write a letter
to the Land Petitions board putting their case forward that they
deserved to have a parcel of land. There was a number of reasons for
this which can be written about... The amount of land given to a soldier
was based on rank. A Sergent would get two hundred acres of land while a
common soldier would recieve one hundred acres of land. The soldiers
would have to clear land, build houses, dig wells etc... If they did all
of this and passed inspection they would recieve full title to the land.
Not all soldiers did take up the offer and many returned home. It was
not only Irish who were offered land but all soldiers who fought. It was
also not just the soldiers but members of the navey who served on the
great lakes and I believe in the Ocean fleet. There was also over five
thousand slaves who left the USA and fled to Canada and joined the
British fighting force who also recieved land grants.

Hope that is of some help to you.

cheers

Ron McCoy

On 1/18/2021 6:52 PM, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList wrote:

Hello Listers,
I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century:

  1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service?
  2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land?
    And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land?

Thanks for any help you can provide,

Katherine Quigley


Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com
List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com
Join the list by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com
To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com


Hi Katherine In Canada after the war of 1812 it was a common practice to offer land to pay out soldiers who fought in the war. Soldiers would write a letter to the Land Petitions board putting their case forward that they deserved to have a parcel of land. There was a number of reasons for this which can be written about... The amount of land given to a soldier was based on rank. A Sergent would get two hundred acres of land while a common soldier would recieve one hundred acres of land. The soldiers would have to clear land, build houses, dig wells etc... If they did all of this and passed inspection they would recieve full title to the land. Not all soldiers did take up the offer and many returned home. It was not only Irish who were offered land but all soldiers who fought. It was also not just the soldiers but members of the navey who served on the great lakes and I believe in the Ocean fleet. There was also over five thousand slaves who left the USA and fled to Canada and joined the British fighting force who also recieved land grants. Hope that is of some help to you. cheers Ron McCoy On 1/18/2021 6:52 PM, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList wrote: > Hello Listers, > I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century: > 1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service? > 2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land? > And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land? > > Thanks for any help you can provide, > > Katherine Quigley > ================================= > Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com > List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com > Join the list by sending an email to - cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com > To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com > Unsubscribe by sending an email to - cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com > =================================
ES
Elwyn Soutter
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 2:54 AM

Katherine,

 

No. Someone in the army would not have acquired land that way in the 18th & 19th centuries.  It did happen in the 17th century, but by the 1700s all the land was already owned by someone, and there was no spare land to give out even if they had wanted to. Shortage of spare land in Ireland was one of the many factors behind peoples decision to migrate from Ireland in the 1700s and later.

 

The father did often leave his land to a son. Frequently the eldest but not always. I have seen plenty of exceptions. Most farms were too small to split, so the expectation was that it would all go to one son, and the others would have to make their own way in the world. Thus often leading to emigration. 

 

Few farmers actually owned their land. It was normally leased. The big landowners (who rarely, if ever, farmed themselves) preferred rental income to the capital raised from selling.  This meant that a farmer might work a farm for 30 years, gradually improving it and increasing it’s value, only to find that the rent increased because of his own efforts. A bit galling and another reason why folk emigrated to places where there was land available with the freehold. When a farmer left the farm to a son in Ireland, what he was leaving was the value of the unexpired portion of the lease plus all the seed, tools, animals, crops in the ground etc. But only very rarely did he have outright ownership of the land itself.  As the 1800s progressed, various changes were made to leasehold law, which meant that provided you paid your rent, a farmer could expect to stay on the property indefinitely. The landlord had to renew, and there were some caps on rent increases. So tenure was almost guaranteed (subject to rent being paid) but not outright ownership.

 

Where someone did have outright ownership of property, in Griffiths Valuation it normally appears as “in fee.” Or occasionally as “free” though this latter term tended to refer to someone with squatters rights for typically a small cottage or a bit of bog, rather than a whole farm.

 

In the aristocracy it was common for the eldest son to inherit the estate, and for younger sons to join the army or navy or become Ministers. The average farmer in Tyrone wasn’t aristocracy. And even in the aristocracy military service didn’t result in being granted land. You might get a pension at the end of service but not land.

 

 
Elwyn
On Monday, 18 January 2021, 23:53:01 GMT, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com wrote:

Hello Listers,
I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century:

  1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service?
  2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land?
    And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land?

Thanks for any help you can provide,

Katherine Quigley


Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com
List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com
Join the list by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com
To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com


Katherine,   No. Someone in the army would not have acquired land that way in the 18th & 19th centuries.  It did happen in the 17th century, but by the 1700s all the land was already owned by someone, and there was no spare land to give out even if they had wanted to. Shortage of spare land in Ireland was one of the many factors behind peoples decision to migrate from Ireland in the 1700s and later.   The father did often leave his land to a son. Frequently the eldest but not always. I have seen plenty of exceptions. Most farms were too small to split, so the expectation was that it would all go to one son, and the others would have to make their own way in the world. Thus often leading to emigration.    Few farmers actually owned their land. It was normally leased. The big landowners (who rarely, if ever, farmed themselves) preferred rental income to the capital raised from selling.  This meant that a farmer might work a farm for 30 years, gradually improving it and increasing it’s value, only to find that the rent increased because of his own efforts. A bit galling and another reason why folk emigrated to places where there was land available with the freehold. When a farmer left the farm to a son in Ireland, what he was leaving was the value of the unexpired portion of the lease plus all the seed, tools, animals, crops in the ground etc. But only very rarely did he have outright ownership of the land itself.  As the 1800s progressed, various changes were made to leasehold law, which meant that provided you paid your rent, a farmer could expect to stay on the property indefinitely. The landlord had to renew, and there were some caps on rent increases. So tenure was almost guaranteed (subject to rent being paid) but not outright ownership.   Where someone did have outright ownership of property, in Griffiths Valuation it normally appears as “in fee.” Or occasionally as “free” though this latter term tended to refer to someone with squatters rights for typically a small cottage or a bit of bog, rather than a whole farm.   In the aristocracy it was common for the eldest son to inherit the estate, and for younger sons to join the army or navy or become Ministers. The average farmer in Tyrone wasn’t aristocracy. And even in the aristocracy military service didn’t result in being granted land. You might get a pension at the end of service but not land.     Elwyn On Monday, 18 January 2021, 23:53:01 GMT, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList <cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com> wrote: Hello Listers, I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century: 1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service? 2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land? And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land? Thanks for any help you can provide, Katherine Quigley ================================= Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com Join the list by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com Unsubscribe by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com =================================
AS
AJ Staley
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 3:05 AM

This is extremely helpful!  Thank you very much for posting the question Katherine Quigley and Elwyn Soutter for the write-up.

Anjeannette Staley

From: Elwyn Soutter via CoTyroneList cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 6:54 PM
To: cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com
Cc: Elwyn Soutter elwynsoutter@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: [CoTyroneMailingList] Re: Incentive/Land Ownership Question

Katherine,

No. Someone in the army would not have acquired land that way in the 18th & 19th centuries.  It did happen in the 17th century, but by the 1700s all the land was already owned by someone, and there was no spare land to give out even if they had wanted to. Shortage of spare land in Ireland was one of the many factors behind peoples decision to migrate from Ireland in the 1700s and later.

The father did often leave his land to a son. Frequently the eldest but not always. I have seen plenty of exceptions. Most farms were too small to split, so the expectation was that it would all go to one son, and the others would have to make their own way in the world. Thus often leading to emigration.

Few farmers actually owned their land. It was normally leased. The big landowners (who rarely, if ever, farmed themselves) preferred rental income to the capital raised from selling.  This meant that a farmer might work a farm for 30 years, gradually improving it and increasing it’s value, only to find that the rent increased because of his own efforts. A bit galling and another reason why folk emigrated to places where there was land available with the freehold. When a farmer left the farm to a son in Ireland, what he was leaving was the value of the unexpired portion of the lease plus all the seed, tools, animals, crops in the ground etc. But only very rarely did he have outright ownership of the land itself.  As the 1800s progressed, various changes were made to leasehold law, which meant that provided you paid your rent, a farmer could expect to stay on the property indefinitely. The landlord had to renew, and there were some caps on rent increases. So tenure was almost guaranteed (subject to rent being paid) but not outright ownership.

Where someone did have outright ownership of property, in Griffiths Valuation it normally appears as “in fee.” Or occasionally as “free” though this latter term tended to refer to someone with squatters rights for typically a small cottage or a bit of bog, rather than a whole farm.

In the aristocracy it was common for the eldest son to inherit the estate, and for younger sons to join the army or navy or become Ministers. The average farmer in Tyrone wasn’t aristocracy. And even in the aristocracy military service didn’t result in being granted land. You might get a pension at the end of service but not land.

Elwyn

On Monday, 18 January 2021, 23:53:01 GMT, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList <cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com mailto:cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com > wrote:

Hello Listers,

I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century:

  1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service?

  2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land?

And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land?

Thanks for any help you can provide,

Katherine Quigley


Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com mailto:cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com

List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com

Join the list by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com mailto:cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com

To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com mailto:cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com

Unsubscribe by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com mailto:cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com


This is extremely helpful! Thank you very much for posting the question Katherine Quigley and Elwyn Soutter for the write-up. Anjeannette Staley From: Elwyn Soutter via CoTyroneList <cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 6:54 PM To: cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com Cc: Elwyn Soutter <elwynsoutter@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: [CoTyroneMailingList] Re: Incentive/Land Ownership Question Katherine, No. Someone in the army would not have acquired land that way in the 18th & 19th centuries. It did happen in the 17th century, but by the 1700s all the land was already owned by someone, and there was no spare land to give out even if they had wanted to. Shortage of spare land in Ireland was one of the many factors behind peoples decision to migrate from Ireland in the 1700s and later. The father did often leave his land to a son. Frequently the eldest but not always. I have seen plenty of exceptions. Most farms were too small to split, so the expectation was that it would all go to one son, and the others would have to make their own way in the world. Thus often leading to emigration. Few farmers actually owned their land. It was normally leased. The big landowners (who rarely, if ever, farmed themselves) preferred rental income to the capital raised from selling. This meant that a farmer might work a farm for 30 years, gradually improving it and increasing it’s value, only to find that the rent increased because of his own efforts. A bit galling and another reason why folk emigrated to places where there was land available with the freehold. When a farmer left the farm to a son in Ireland, what he was leaving was the value of the unexpired portion of the lease plus all the seed, tools, animals, crops in the ground etc. But only very rarely did he have outright ownership of the land itself. As the 1800s progressed, various changes were made to leasehold law, which meant that provided you paid your rent, a farmer could expect to stay on the property indefinitely. The landlord had to renew, and there were some caps on rent increases. So tenure was almost guaranteed (subject to rent being paid) but not outright ownership. Where someone did have outright ownership of property, in Griffiths Valuation it normally appears as “in fee.” Or occasionally as “free” though this latter term tended to refer to someone with squatters rights for typically a small cottage or a bit of bog, rather than a whole farm. In the aristocracy it was common for the eldest son to inherit the estate, and for younger sons to join the army or navy or become Ministers. The average farmer in Tyrone wasn’t aristocracy. And even in the aristocracy military service didn’t result in being granted land. You might get a pension at the end of service but not land. Elwyn On Monday, 18 January 2021, 23:53:01 GMT, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList <cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com <mailto:cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com> > wrote: Hello Listers, I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century: 1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service? 2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land? And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land? Thanks for any help you can provide, Katherine Quigley ================================= Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com <mailto:cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com> List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com Join the list by sending an email to - cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com <mailto:cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com> To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com <mailto:cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com> Unsubscribe by sending an email to - cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com <mailto:cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com> =================================
RM
Ron McCoy
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 12:18 PM

Hi Katherine

Part of your question was is it a "common practice for Irish members of
the BRA to be given incentives such as land.." While the land grant was
offered it was not a taken up by every soldier. As example in the
hundred regiment of foot there would be approximetly 1000 men. Only
married men in good standing would be accepted by the Petition Board. In
the end just over one hundred men and their families were given land
grants. Specifically from Tyrone there was about a dozen soldiers who
applied and were accepted to recieve land grants. Multiply this by the
number of regiments and the number is fairly small. Britian at the time
of the war of 1812 had only around five thousand soldiers in Canada so
the number of men from Tyrone recieveing land grants would have been
pretty small if we assume the same percentage as the hundred regiment
carried to all other serving regiments. I believe this land grant system
was carried out to at least 1840's but I see no record of it after that
time that I am aware of.

Cheers

Ron McCoy

On 1/18/2021 6:52 PM, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList wrote:

Hello Listers,
I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century:

  1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service?
  2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land?
    And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land?

Thanks for any help you can provide,

Katherine Quigley


Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com
List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com
Join the list by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com
To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to -  cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com


Hi Katherine Part of your question was is it a "common practice for Irish members of the BRA to be given incentives such as land.." While the land grant was offered it was not a taken up by every soldier. As example in the hundred regiment of foot there would be approximetly 1000 men. Only married men in good standing would be accepted by the Petition Board. In the end just over one hundred men and their families were given land grants. Specifically from Tyrone there was about a dozen soldiers who applied and were accepted to recieve land grants. Multiply this by the number of regiments and the number is fairly small. Britian at the time of the war of 1812 had only around five thousand soldiers in Canada so the number of men from Tyrone recieveing land grants would have been pretty small if we assume the same percentage as the hundred regiment carried to all other serving regiments. I believe this land grant system was carried out to at least 1840's but I see no record of it after that time that I am aware of. Cheers Ron McCoy On 1/18/2021 6:52 PM, Katherine Q via CoTyroneList wrote: > Hello Listers, > I have a 3 part question, referring to County Tyrone in the late 18th - early 19th century: > 1. Does anybody know if it was a common practice for Irish members of the British Royal Army/Military to be given incentives such as land for their service? > 2. Was it a common practice for the oldest son to inherit all of the land that a father owned, if the father owned land? > And 3. If 1 and 2 are so, did that make it more common for younger sons who would not inherit land to join the military in order to get land? > > Thanks for any help you can provide, > > Katherine Quigley > ================================= > Send a Message to the List - cotyronelist@list.cotyroneireland.com > List Archive - https://list.cotyroneireland.com/empathy/list/cotyronelist.list.cotyroneireland.com > Join the list by sending an email to - cotyronelist-subscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com > To receive the Digest version, send an email to - cotyronelist-owner@list.cotyroneireland.com > Unsubscribe by sending an email to - cotyronelist-unsubscribe@list.cotyroneireland.com > =================================