I’m looking to integrate a Gem5 full system model with some of our internal IP. The IP and memory (caches) will be memory mapped. So I’d like it if the Gem5 full system could handle some parts of the system (file IO, system calls) but route requests to certain memory address regions to an external port (I’ve taken care of the conversion from Gem5 port to AXI SystemC). Is this possible?
Hi Jonathan,
Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of addresses
and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the port
interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there are also
already bindings to SystemC/TLM in gem5 as well that could serve as good
examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Kang via gem5-users <
gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
I’m looking to integrate a Gem5 full system model with some of our
internal IP. The IP and memory (caches) will be memory mapped. So I’d like
it if the Gem5 full system could handle some parts of the system (file IO,
system calls) but route requests to certain memory address regions to an
external port (I’ve taken care of the conversion from Gem5 port to AXI
SystemC). Is this possible?
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-leave@gem5.org
Thanks!
Would you have an example of how to instantiate this bridge? Also, I imagine this bridge is right after the CPU I and D side ports and before any membus that Gem5 has internally right?
From: Jason Lowe-Power jason@lowepower.com
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 4:27 PM
To: The gem5 Users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org
Cc: Jonathan Kang mosfet@meta.com
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Full System + external memory
Hi Jonathan, Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Jonathan,
Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there are also already bindings to SystemC/TLM in gem5 as well that could serve as good examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Kang via gem5-users <gem5-users@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
I’m looking to integrate a Gem5 full system model with some of our internal IP. The IP and memory (caches) will be memory mapped. So I’d like it if the Gem5 full system could handle some parts of the system (file IO, system calls) but route requests to certain memory address regions to an external port (I’ve taken care of the conversion from Gem5 port to AXI SystemC). Is this possible?
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-leave@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users-leave@gem5.org
Hi Jonathan,
You can put the bridge wherever you would like. For MMIO things, you can
put it after the point of coherence, which is where we usually put the "I/O
crossbar."
You can poke around in configs/examples and util/systemc for some examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:30 PM Jonathan Kang mosfet@meta.com wrote:
Thanks!
Would you have an example of how to instantiate this bridge? Also, I
imagine this bridge is right after the CPU I and D side ports and before
any membus that Gem5 has internally right?
*From: *Jason Lowe-Power jason@lowepower.com
*Date: *Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 4:27 PM
*To: *The gem5 Users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org
*Cc: *Jonathan Kang mosfet@meta.com
*Subject: *Re: [gem5-users] Full System + external memory
Hi Jonathan, Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a
subset of addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert
from the port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that
there
Hi Jonathan,
Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of
addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the
port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there are
also already bindings to SystemC/TLM in gem5 as well that could serve as
good examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Kang via gem5-users <
gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
I’m looking to integrate a Gem5 full system model with some of our
internal IP. The IP and memory (caches) will be memory mapped. So I’d like
it if the Gem5 full system could handle some parts of the system (file IO,
system calls) but route requests to certain memory address regions to an
external port (I’ve taken care of the conversion from Gem5 port to AXI
SystemC). Is this possible?
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-leave@gem5.org
Great, thanks. I’m looking to have this shuttle memory requests to my external cache and memory model (in SystemC) so it’d be before the point of coherence. In a normal membus system, that’d be before the membus right? Or perhaps one of the ports of the membus.
I’ll take a look at the examples. Thanks a lot!
From: Jason Lowe-Power jason@lowepower.com
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 4:33 PM
To: Jonathan Kang mosfet@meta.com
Cc: The gem5 Users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Full System + external memory
Hi Jonathan, You can put the bridge wherever you would like. For MMIO things, you can put it after the point of coherence, which is where we usually put the "I/O crossbar. " You can poke around in configs/examples and util/systemc
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Jonathan,
You can put the bridge wherever you would like. For MMIO things, you can put it after the point of coherence, which is where we usually put the "I/O crossbar."
You can poke around in configs/examples and util/systemc for some examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:30 PM Jonathan Kang <mosfet@meta.commailto:mosfet@meta.com> wrote:
Thanks!
Would you have an example of how to instantiate this bridge? Also, I imagine this bridge is right after the CPU I and D side ports and before any membus that Gem5 has internally right?
From: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.commailto:jason@lowepower.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 4:27 PM
To: The gem5 Users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>
Cc: Jonathan Kang <mosfet@meta.commailto:mosfet@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Full System + external memory
Hi Jonathan, Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there
Hi Jonathan,
Absolutely! You can set up a "bridge" which will take a subset of addresses and route to a different gem5 port. If you can convert from the port interface to the AXI, then it should "just work". Note that there are also already bindings to SystemC/TLM in gem5 as well that could serve as good examples.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Kang via gem5-users <gem5-users@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
I’m looking to integrate a Gem5 full system model with some of our internal IP. The IP and memory (caches) will be memory mapped. So I’d like it if the Gem5 full system could handle some parts of the system (file IO, system calls) but route requests to certain memory address regions to an external port (I’ve taken care of the conversion from Gem5 port to AXI SystemC). Is this possible?
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-leave@gem5.orgmailto:gem5-users-leave@gem5.org